The Bottom of the Republican Barrel

November 15, 2008

With the selection of Sarah Palin as his running mate John McCain believed that he had secured the Republican base. He may well have secured much more than that. With Ms. Palin’s introduction to the political discourse the more extreme elements of the GOP have been stirred up from the bottom to show their ugly heads with phrases such as, “he is a Muslim”, “his name is Hussein”, “he hangs out with terrorists”, and “he doesn’t respect our flag”. These have become the slogans with which the McCain campaign presumably expected to rally the faithful. From my experience as an Obama campaign volunteer in Western Virginia I can report that it was not working as intended. Many moderate and old-time Republicans shared their disgust. Among them the number that expressed a vote for Obama was roughly equal to the number that would not vote at all. One has to wonder what it is that got McCain in this position. By his own admission he plays to win and, again by his own admission, he is sometimes blinded by that ambition. If that is the case here than it is a small step to surmise that he either, A. approved of or, worse, initiated the venom, or, B. had lost control of the campaign. The forces he unleashed now lead a life of their own and will be very difficult to reign in. By equating Obama with terrorism he has given the Timothy McVeigh’s at the bottom of the barrel license to conduct their despicable acts. Are they the patriots that he called to save the nation from the terrible threats of socialism, another wild accusation?

John McCain’s task of uniting the GOP around him was an impossible one. He was the accidental candidate. On the core emotional issues he was not the party’s ideal representative. He survived the primary process because he stood out as the elderly statesman in a field of mediocrity. In a desperate attempt to appeal to the party base he dug too deep and came up with a running mate who was a non-intellectual radical that appealed to those who wear their ignorance as a badge of honor. No wonder intellectuals such as George Will, Colin Powell, Paul Volker, David Brooks, and Chuck Hagel were not impressed, and have, to different degrees, expressed a preference for Barack Obama.

In contrast the Obama campaign was low-key but high-exposure. Large numbers of volunteers went door to door for a neighborly chat, about issues. There was no pressure – the voters were doing most of the talking. And, sometimes to their surprise, many found themselves leaning in Obama’s direction. We never brought up the subject of John McCain or Sarah Palin. We asked which issues were important and, if invited, would clarify a point or two about taxes or health insurance. We regarded every voter as an intelligent human being and we respected their positions, also when they disagreed and declared themselves for McCain. We didn’t argue. And, we were, occasionally, at the receiving end of rather abusive language. It often included the list of words listed above and was always delivered in a highly emotional tone of voice.

This election was no longer a choice between Obama and McCain. This election had become about how the Republic serves its voters, whether “The People” were allowed to make their choices based on their interests rather than their emotions, and whether we would be governed by the most able rather than the most belligerent.

Advertisements

2 Responses to “The Bottom of the Republican Barrel”

  1. rednecks for obama said

    You astutely point out that this election was a referendum on voting on the issues and/or self-interest versus irrational fears or base emotions.

    And what was remarkable was how Obama steered his campaign in that direction and largely, at least by the low standards of an American presidential election, refused to pander in the usual ways, from not trading shots of whiskey with Kentucky rednecks to refusing to eat a doughnut in a Philadelphia (or somewhere in PA during the primary) diner.

    It’s just as well, too. Because when he tried to be something he’s not, he looked silly, whether it was the gutter ball he rolled in the PA bowling alley or the game of pool he shot in Charleston, WV in May.

    I won’t say this guy’s something we ain’t seen before because we have seen intellectuals run for president–Gene McCarthy and Adlai Stevenson come to mind, and JFK carried himself with a cool detachment that suggested a patrician bearing and a Harvard education. (Of course, JFK was also an Irish pol from Boston, grandson of Honey Fitz, and if he didn’t act like one, he had people around him who were hardball, urban, Irish-American political brawlers from the old school…like Larry O’Brien and brother Bobby.

    Me? I think Barack’s an alien who was outed by his adorable daughters last summer when they said, “Daddy doesn’t like ice cream. Who doesn’t like ice cream?”

  2. crudley said

    Rednecks for Obama appears to imply that politics are driven primarily by personalities. I think he is right. The inherent danger is that we do not look at the issues but are drawn to populism instead. And that, “my friends”, is what gets us to swim downward in any barrel. It is time that we restore “the parties” and their more stable/constant “programs”. What better way to do this then to force individuals together in a system of proportional representation.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: